[
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_1.0.0.0",
	"text":"1.0.0.0 Introduction The American Diabetes Association (ADA) “Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes” includes ADA’s current clinical practice recommendations and is intended to provide the components of diabetes care, general treatment goals and guidelines, and tools to evaluate quality of care. Members of the ADA Professional Practice Committee, a multidisciplinary expert committee, are responsible for updating the Standards of Care annually, or more frequently as warranted. For a detailed description of ADA standards, statements, and reports, as well as the evidence-‍grading system for ADA’s clinical practice recommendations, please refer to the Standards of Care Introduction. Readers who wish to comment on the Standards of Care are invited to do so at professional.diabetes.org/‍SOC. Lifestyle management is a fundamental aspect of diabetes care and includes diabetes self-‍management education and support (DSMES), medical nutrition therapy (MNT), physical activity, smoking cessation counseling, and psychosocial care. Patients and care providers should focus together on how to optimize lifestyle from the time of the initial comprehensive medical evaluation, throughout all subsequent evaluations and follow-‍up, and during the assessment of complications and management of comorbid conditions in order to enhance diabetes care. Suggested citation: American Diabetes Association. 5. Lifestyle management: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2019. Diabetes Care 2019;42(Suppl. 1):S46–S60 © 2018 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. More information is available at http://www.diabetesjournals.org/‍content/‍license."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_2.1.0.0",
	"text":"2.0.0.0 DM Self-‍Management Education & Support 2.1.0.0 Recommendations Recommendations 5.1 In accordance with the national standards for diabetes self-‍management education and support, all people with diabetes should participate in diabetes self-‍management education to facilitate the knowledge, skills, and ability necessary for diabetes self-‍care. Diabetes self-‍management support is additionally recommended to assist with implementing and sustaining skills and behaviors needed for ongoing self-‍management. B 5.2 There are four critical times to evaluate the need for diabetes selfmanagement education and support: at diagnosis, annually, when complicating factors arise, and when transitions in care occur. E 5.3 Clinical outcomes, health status, and quality of life are key goals of diabetes self-‍management education and support that should be measured as part of routine care. C 5.4 Diabetes self-‍management education and support should be patient centered, may be given in group or individual settings or using technology, and should be communicated with the entire diabetes care team. A 5.5 Because diabetes self-‍management education and support can improve outcomes and reduce costs B, adequate reimbursement by third-‍party payers is recommended. E 2.2.0.0 Overview DSMES services facilitate the knowledge, skills, and abilities necessary for optimal diabetes self-‍care and incorporate the needs, goals, and life experiences of the person with diabetes. The overall objectives of DSMES are to support informed decision making, self-‍care behaviors, problem-‍solving, and active collaboration with the health care team to improve clinical outcomes, health status, and quality of life in a cost-‍effective manner (1). Providers are encouraged to consider the burden of treatment and the patient’s level of confidence/ self-‍efficacy for management behaviors as well as the level of social and family support when providing DSMES. Patient performance of self-‍management behaviors, including its effect on clinical outcomes, health status, and quality of life, as well as the psychosocial factors impacting the person’s self-‍management should be monitored as part of routine clinical care. In addition, in response to the growing literature that associates potentially judgmental words with increased feelings of shame and guilt, providers are encouraged to consider the impact that language has on building therapeutic relationships and to choose positive, strength-‍based words and phrases that put people first (2,3). Patient performance of self-‍management behaviors as well as psychosocial factors impacting the person’s self-‍management should be monitored. Please see Section 4, “Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities,” for more on use of language. DSMES and the current national standards guiding it (1,4) are based on evidence of benefit. Specifically, DSMES helps people with diabetes to identify and implement effective self-‍management strategies and cope with diabetes at the four critical time points (described below) (1). Ongoing DSMES helps people with diabetes to maintain effective self-‍management throughout a lifetime of diabetes as they face new challenges and as advances in treatment become available (5). Four critical time points have been defined when the need for DSMES is to be evaluated by the medical care provider and/‍or multidisciplinary team, with referrals made as needed (1): At diagnosis Annually for assessment of education, nutrition, and emotional needs When new complicating factors (health conditions, physical limitations, emotional factors, or basic living needs) arise that influence self-‍management When transitions in care occur DSMES focuses on supporting patient empowerment by providing people with diabetes the tools to make informed self-‍management decisions (6). Diabetes care has shifted to an approach that places the person with diabetes and his or her family at the center of the care model, working in collaboration with health care professionals. Patient-‍centered care is respectful of and responsive to individual patient preferences, needs, and values. It ensures that patient values guide all decision making (7)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_2.3.0.0",
	"text":"2.3.0.0 Evidence for the Benefits Studies have found that DSMES is associated with improved diabetes knowledge and self-‍care behaviors (8), lower A1C (7,9–11), lower self-‍reported weight (12,13), improved quality of life (10,14), reduced all-‍cause mortality risk (15), healthy coping (16,17), and reduced health care costs (18-20). Better outcomes were reported for DSMES interventions that were over 10 h in total duration (11), included ongoing support (5,21), were culturally (22,23) and age appropriate (24,25), were tailored to individual needs and preferences, and addressed psychosocial issues and incorporated behavioral strategies (6,16,26,27). Individual and group approaches are effective (13,28,29), with a slight benefit realized by those who engage in both (11). Emerging evidence demonstrates the benefit of Internet-‍based DSMES services for diabetes prevention and the management of type 2 diabetes (30-32). Technology-‍enabled diabetes self-‍management solutions improve A1C most effectively when there is two-‍way communication between the patient and the health care team, individualized feedback, use of patient-generated health data, and education (32). Current research supports nurses, dietitians, and pharmacists as providers of DSMES who may also develop curriculum (33-35). Members of the DSMES team should have specialized clinical knowledge in diabetes and behavior change principles. Certification as a certified diabetes educator (CDE) or board certified-‍advanced diabetes management (BC-‍ADM) certification demonstrates specialized training and mastery of a specific body of knowledge (4). Additionally, there is growing evidence for the role of community health workers (36,37), as well as peer (36-40) and lay leaders (41), in providing ongoing support. DSMES is associated with an increased use of primary care and preventive services (18,42,43) and less frequent use of acute care and inpatient hospital services (12). Patients who participate in DSMES are more likely to follow best practice treatment recommendations, particularly among the Medicare population, and have lower Medicare and insurance claim costs (19,42). Despite these benefits, reports indicate that only 5–7% of individuals eligible for DSMES through Medicare or a private insurance plan actually receive it (44,45). This low participation may be due to lack of referral or other identified barriers such as logistical issues (timing, costs) and the lack of a perceived benefit (46). Thus, in addition to educating referring providers about the benefits of DSMES and the critical times to refer (1), alternative and innovative models of DSMES delivery need to be explored and evaluated."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_2.4.0.0",
	"text":"2.4.0.0 Reimbursement Medicare reimburses DSMES when that service meets the national standards (1,4) and is recognized by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) or other approval bodies. DSMES is also covered by most health insurance plans. Ongoing support has been shown to be instrumental for improving outcomes when it is implemented after the completion of education services. DSMES is frequently reimbursed when performed in person. However, although DSMES can also be provided via phone calls and telehealth, these remote versions may not always be reimbursed. Changes in reimbursement policies that increase DSMES access and utilization will result in a positive impact to beneficiaries’ clinical outcomes, quality of life, health care utilization, and costs (47)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.1.0.0",
	"text":"3.0.0.0 NUTRITION THERAPY 3.1.0.0 Overview For many individuals with diabetes, the most challenging part of the treatment plan is determining what to eat and following a meal plan. There is not a one-‍size-‍fits-‍all eating pattern for individuals with diabetes, and meal planning should be individualized. Nutrition therapy has an integral role in overall diabetes management, and each person with diabetes should be actively engaged in education, self-‍management, and treatment planning with his or her health care team, including the collaborative development of an individualized eating plan (35,48). All individuals with diabetes should be offered a referral for individualized MNT provided by a registered dietitian (RD) who is knowledgeable and skilled in providing diabetes-‍specific MNT (49). MNT delivered by an RD is associated with A1C decreases of 1.0–1.9% for people with type 1 diabetes (50) and 0.3–2% for people with type 2 diabetes (50). See Table 5.1 for specific nutrition recommendations. Because of the progressive nature of type 2 diabetes, lifestyle changes alone may not be adequate to maintain euglycemia over time. However, after medication is initiated, nutrition therapy continues to be an important component and should be integrated with the overall treatment plan (48). Table 5.1—Medical nutrition therapy recommendations Topic Recommendations Evidence rating Effectiveness of nutrition therapy 5.6    An individualized medical nutrition therapy program as needed to achieve treatment goals, preferably provided by a registered dietitian, is recommended for all people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, and gestational diabetes mellitus. A 5.7    A simple and effective approach to glycemia and weight management emphasizing portion control and healthy food choicesmaybe considered for those with type 2 diabeteswhoare not taking insulin, who have limited health literacy or numeracy, or who are older and prone to hypoglycemia. B 5.8    Because diabetes nutrition therapy can result in cost savings B and improved outcomes (e.g., A1C reduction) A, medical nutrition therapy should be adequately reimbursed by insurance and other payers. E B, A, E Energy balance 5.9    Weight loss ( >5%) achievable by the combination of reduction of calorie intake and lifestyle modification benefits overweight or obese adults with type 2 diabetes and also those with prediabetes. Intervention programs to facilitate weight loss are recommended. A Eating patterns and macronutrient distribution 5.10  There is no single ideal dietary distribution of calories among carbohydrates, fats, and proteins for people with diabetes; therefore, meal plans should be individualized while keeping total calorie and metabolic goals in mind. E 5.11  A variety of eating patterns are acceptable for themanagement of type 2 diabetes and prediabetes. B Carbohydrates 5.12  Carbohydrate intake should emphasize nutrient-‍dense carbohydrate sources that are high in fiber, including vegetables, fruits, legumes, whole grains, as well as dairy products. B 5.13   For people with type 1 diabetes and those with type 2 diabeteswhoare prescribed a flexible insulin therapy program, education on how to use carbohydrate counting A and in some cases how to consider fat and protein content B to determine mealtime insulin dosing is recommended to improve glycemic control. A, B 5.14   For individuals whose daily insulin dosing is fixed, a consistent pattern of carbohydrate intake with respect to time and amount may be recommended to improve glycemic control and reduce the risk of hypoglycemia. B 5.15   People with diabetes and those at risk are advised to avoid sugar-‍sweetened beverages (including fruit juices) in order to control glycemia and weight and reduce their risk for cardiovascular disease and fatty liver B and should minimize the consumption of foods with added sugar that have the capacity to displace healthier, more nutrient-‍dense food choices. A B, A Protein 5.16   In individuals with type 2 diabetes, ingested protein appears to increase insulin response without increasing plasma glucose concentrations. Therefore, carbohydrate sources high in protein should be avoided when trying to treat or prevent hypoglycemia. B Dietary fat 5.17   Data on the ideal total dietary fat content for people with diabetes are inconclusive, so an eating plan emphasizing elements of a Mediterranean-‍style diet rich in monounsaturated and polyunsaturated fats may be considered to improve glucose metabolism and lower cardiovascular disease risk and can be an effective alternative to a diet low in total fat but relatively high in carbohydrates. B 5.18   Eating foods rich in long-‍chain n-3 fatty acids, such as fatty fish (EPA and DHA) and nuts and seeds (ALA), is recommended to prevent or treat cardiovascular disease B; however, evidence does not support a beneficial role for the routine use of n-3 dietary supplements. A B, A Micronutrients and herbal supplements 5.19   There is no clear evidence that dietary supplementation with vitamins, minerals (such as chromium and vitamin D), herbs, or spices (such as cinnamon or aloe vera) can improve outcomes in people with diabetes who do not have underlying deficiencies and they are not generally recommended for glycemic control. C Alcohol 5.20   Adults with diabetes who drink alcohol should do so in moderation (no more than one drink per day for adult women and no more than two drinks per day for adult men). C 5.21   Alcohol consumptionmayplace people with diabetes at increased risk for hypoglycemia, especially if taking insulin or insulin secretagogues. Education and awareness regarding the recognition and management of delayed hypoglycemia are warranted. B Sodium 5.22   As for the general population, people with diabetes should limit sodium consumption to <2,300 mg/day. B Nonnutritive sweeteners 5.23  The use of nonnutritive sweeteners may have the potential to reduce overall calorie and carbohydrate intake if substituted for caloric (sugar) sweetenersand without compensation by intake of additional calories from other food sources. For those who consume sugar-‍sweetened beverages regularly, a low-‍calorie or nonnutritive-sweetened beverage may serve as a short-‍term replacement strategy, but overall, people are encouraged to decrease both sweetened and nonnutritive-sweetened beverages and use other alternatives, with an emphasis on water intake. B"
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.2.0.0",
	"text":"3.2.0.0 Adults With DM, Goals of Nutrition Therapy 1. To promote and support healthful eating patterns, emphasizing a variety of nutrient-‍dense foods in appropriate portion sizes, to improve overall health and: Achieve and maintain body weight goals Attain individualized glycemic, blood pressure, and lipid goals Delay or prevent the complications of diabetes 2. To address individual nutrition needs based on personal and cultural preferences, health literacy and numeracy, access to healthful foods, willingness and ability to make behavioral changes, and barriers to change 3. To maintain the pleasure of eating by providing nonjudgmental messages about food choices 4. To provide an individual with diabetes the practical tools for developing healthy eating patterns rather than focusing on individual macronutrients, micronutrients, or single foods"
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.3.0.0",
	"text":"3.3.0.0 Eating Patterns and Meal Planning Evidence suggests that there is not an ideal percentage of calories from carbohydrate, protein, and fat for all people with diabetes. Therefore, macronutrient distribution should be based on an individualized assessment of current eating patterns, preferences, and metabolic goals. Consider personal preferences (e.g., tradition, culture, religion, health beliefs and goals, economics) as well as metabolic goals when working with individuals to determine the best eating pattern for them (35,51,52). It is important that each member of the health care team be knowledgeable about nutrition therapy principles for people with all types of diabetes and be supportive of their implementation. Emphasis should be on healthful eating patterns containing nutrient-‍dense foods, with less focus on specific nutrients (53). A variety of eating patterns are acceptable for the management of diabetes (51,54), and a referral to an RD or registered dietitian nutritionist (RDN) is essential to assess the overall nutrition status of, and to work collaboratively with, the patient to create a personalized meal plan that considers the individual’s health status, skills, resources, food preferences, and health goals to coordinate and align with the overall treatment plan including physical activity and medication. The Mediterranean (55,56), Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH) (57-59), and plant-‍based (60,61) diets are all examples of healthful eating patterns that have shown positive results in research, but individualized meal planning should focus on personal preferences, needs, and goals. In addition, research indicates that low-carbohydrate eating plans may result in improved glycemia and have the potential to reduce antihyperglycemic medications for individuals with type 2 diabetes (62-64). As research studies on some low-‍carbohydrate eating plans generally indicate challenges with long-term sustainability, it is important to reassess and individualize meal plan guidance regularly for those interested in this approach. This meal plan is not recommended at this time for women who are pregnant or lactating, people with or at risk for disordered eating, or people who have renal disease, and it should be used with caution in patients taking sodium–glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors due to the potential risk of ketoacidosis (65,66). There is inadequate research in type 1 diabetes to support one eating plan over another at this time. A simple and effective approach to glycemia and weight management emphasizing portion control and healthy food choices should be considered for those with type 2 diabetes who are not taking insulin, who have limited health literacy or numeracy, or who are older and prone to hypoglycemia (50). The diabetes plate method is commonly used for providing basic meal planning guidance (67) as it provides a visual guide showing how to control calories (by featuring a smaller plate) and carbohydrates (by limiting them to what fits in one-‍quarter of the plate) and puts an emphasis on low-‍carbohydrate (or non-starchy) vegetables."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.4.0.0",
	"text":"3.4.0.0 Weight Management Management and reduction of weight is important for people with type 1 diabetes, type 2 diabetes, or prediabetes who have overweight or obesity. Lifestyle intervention programs should be intensive and have frequent follow-‍up to achieve significant reductions in excess body weight and improve clinical indicators. There is strong and consistent evidence that modest persistent weight loss can delay the progression from prediabetes to type 2 diabetes (51,68,69) (see Section 3 “Prevention or Delay of Type 2 Diabetes”) and is beneficial to the management of type 2 diabetes (see Section 8 “Obesity Management for the Treatment of Type 2 Diabetes”). Studies of reduced calorie interventions show reductions in A1C of 0.3% to 2.0% in adults with type 2 diabetes, as well as improvements in medication doses and quality of life (50,51). Sustaining weight loss can be challenging (70,71) but has long-‍term benefits; maintaining weight loss for 5 years is associated with sustained improvements in A1C and lipid levels (72). Weight loss can be attained with lifestyle programs that achieve a 500–750 kcal/‍day energy deficit or provide ~1,200–1,500 kcal/‍day for women and 1,500–1,800 kcal/‍day for men, adjusted for the individual’s baseline body weight. For many obese individuals with type 2 diabetes, weight loss of at least 5% is needed to produce beneficial outcomes in glycemic control, lipids, and blood pressure (70). It should be noted, however, that the clinical benefits of weight loss are progressive and more intensive weight loss goals (i.e., 15%) may be appropriate to maximize benefit depending on need, feasibility, and safety (73). MNT guidance from an RD/‍RDN with expertise in diabetes and weight management, throughout the course of a structured weight loss plan, is strongly recommended. Studies have demonstrated that a variety of eating plans, varying in macronutrient composition, can be used effectively and safely in the short term (1–2 years) to achieve weight loss in people with diabetes. This includes structured low-‍calorie meal plans that include meal replacements (72-74) and the Mediterranean eating pattern (75) as well as low-‍carbohydrate meal plans (62). However, no single approach has been proven to be consistently superior (76,77), and more data are needed to identify and validate those meal plans that are optimal with respect to longterm outcomes as well as patient acceptability. The importance of providing guidance on an individualized meal plan containing nutrient-‍dense foods, such as vegetables, fruits, legumes, dairy, lean sources of protein (including plant-‍based sources as well as lean meats, fish, and poultry), nuts, seeds, and whole grains, cannot be overemphasized (77), as well as guidance on achieving the desired energy deficit (78-81). Any approach to meal planning should be individualized considering the health status, personal preferences, and ability of the person with diabetes to sustain the recommendations in the plan."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.5.0.0",
	"text":"3.5.0.0 Carbohydrates Studies examining the ideal amount of carbohydrate intake for people with diabetes are inconclusive, although monitoring carbohydrate intake and considering the blood glucose response to dietary carbohydrate are key for improving postprandial glucose control (82,83). The literature concerning glycemic index and glycemic load in individuals with diabetes is complex, often yielding mixed results, though in some studies lowering the glycemic load of consumed carbohydrates has demonstrated A1C reductions of 0.2% to 0.5% (84,85). Studies longer than 12 weeks report no significant influence of glycemic index or glycemic load independent of weight loss on A1C; however, mixed results have been reported for fasting glucose levels and endogenous insulin levels. For people with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes, low-‍carbohydrate eating plans show potential to improve glycemia and lipid outcomes for up to 1 year (62–64,86–89). Part of the challenge in interpreting low-‍carbohydrate research has been due to the wide range of definitions for a low-‍carbohydrate eating plan (85,86). As research studies on low-‍carbohydrate eating plans generally indicate challenges with long-‍term sustainability, it is important to reassess and individualize meal plan guidance regularly for those interested in this approach. Providers should maintain consistent medical oversight and recognize that certain groups are not appropriate for low-‍carbohydrate eating plans, including women who are pregnant or lactating, children, and people who have renal disease or disordered eating behavior, and these plans should be used with caution for those taking SGLT2 inhibitors due to potential risk of ketoacidosis (65,66). There is inadequate research about dietary patterns for type 1 diabetes to support one eating plan over another at this time. Most individuals with diabetes report a moderate intake of carbohydrate (44–46% of total calories) (51). Efforts to modify habitual eating patterns are often unsuccessful in the long term; people generally go back to their usual macronutrient distribution (51). Thus, the recommended approach is to individualize meal plans to meet caloric goals with a macronutrient distribution that is more consistent with the individual’s usual intake to increase the likelihood for long-‍term maintenance. As for all individuals in developed countries, both children and adults with diabetes are encouraged to minimize intake of refined carbohydrates and added sugars and instead focus on carbohydrates from vegetables, legumes, fruits, dairy (milk and yogurt), and whole grains. The consumption of sugar-‍sweetened beverages (including fruit juices) and processed “low-‍fat” or “nonfat” food products with high amounts of refined grains and added sugars is strongly discouraged (90-92). Individuals with type 1 or type 2 diabetes taking insulin at mealtime should be offered intensive and ongoing education on the need to couple insulin administration with carbohydrate intake. For people whose meal schedule or carbohydrate consumption is variable, regular counseling to help them understand the complex relationship between carbohydrate intake and insulin needs is important. In addition, education on using the insulin-to-carbohydrate ratios for meal planning can assist them with effectively modifying insulin dosing from meal to meal and improving glycemic control (51,82,93–96). Individuals who consume meals containing more protein and fat than usual may also need to make mealtime insulin dose adjustments to compensate for delayed postprandial glycemic excursions (97-99). For individuals on a fixed daily insulin schedule, meal planning should emphasize a relatively fixed carbohydrate consumption pattern with respect to both time and amount (35)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.6.0.0",
	"text":"3.6.0.0 Protein There is no evidence that adjusting the daily level of protein intake (typically 1–1.5 g/kg body weight/‍day or 15–20% total calories) will improve health in individuals without diabetic kidney disease, and research is inconclusive regarding the ideal amount of dietary protein to optimize either glycemic control or cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk (84,100). Therefore, protein intake goals should be individualized based on current eating patterns. Some research has found successful management of type 2 diabetes with meal plans including slightly higher levels of protein (20–30%), which may contribute to increased satiety (58). Those with diabetic kidney disease (with albuminuria and/‍or reduced estimated glomerular filtration rate) should aim to maintain dietary protein at the recommended daily allowance of 0.8 g/kg body weight/‍day. Reducing the amount of dietary protein below the recommended daily allowance is not recommended because it does not alter glycemic measures, cardiovascular risk measures, or the rate at which glomerular filtration rate declines (101,102). In individuals with type 2 diabetes, protein intake may enhance or increase the insulin response to dietary carbohydrates (103). Therefore, use of carbohydrate sources high in protein (such as milk and nuts) to treat or prevent hypoglycemia should be avoided due to the potential concurrent rise in endogenous insulin."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.7.0.0",
	"text":"3.7.0.0 Fats The ideal amount of dietary fat for individuals with diabetes is controversial. The National Academy of Medicine has defined an acceptable macronutrient distribution for total fat for all adults to be 20–35% of total calorie intake (104). The type of fats consumed is more important than total amount of fat when looking at metabolic goals and CVD risk, and it is recommended that the percentage of total calories from saturated fats should be limited (75,90,105–107). Multiple randomized controlled trials including patients with type 2 diabetes have reported that a Mediterranean-‍style eating pattern (75,108–113), rich in polyunsaturated and monounsaturated fats, can improve both glycemic control and blood lipids. However, supplements do not seem to have the same effects as their whole-‍food counterparts. A systematic review concluded that dietary supplements with n-3 fatty acids did not improve glycemic control in individuals with type 2 diabetes (84). Randomized controlled trials also do not support recommending n-3 supplements for primary or secondary prevention of CVD (114-118). People with diabetes should be advised to follow the guidelines for the general population for the recommended intakes of saturated fat, dietary cholesterol, and trans fat (90). In general, trans fats should be avoided. In addition, as saturated fats are progressively decreased in the diet, they should be replaced with unsaturated fats and not with refined carbohydrates (112)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.8.0.0",
	"text":"3.8.0.0 Sodium As for the general population, people with diabetes are advised to limit their sodium consumption to <2,300 mg/‍day (35). Restriction below 1,500 mg, even for those with hypertension, is generally not recommended (119-121). Sodium intake recommendations should take into account palatability, availability, affordability, and the difficulty of achieving low-‍sodium recommendations in a nutritionally adequate diet (122)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.9.0.0",
	"text":"3.9.0.0 Micronutrients and Supplements There continues to be no clear evidence of benefit from herbal or nonherbal (i.e., vitamin or mineral) supplementation for people with diabetes without underlying deficiencies (35). Metformin is associated with vitamin B12 deficiency, with a recent report from the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study (DPPOS) suggesting that periodic testing of vitamin B12 levels should be considered in patients taking metformin, particularly in those with anemia or peripheral neuropathy (123). Routine supplementation with antioxidants, such as vitamins E and C and carotene, is not advised due to lack of evidence of efficacy and concern related to long-‍term safety. In addition, there is insufficient evidence to support the routine use of herbals and micronutrients, such as cinnamon (124), curcumin, vitamin D (125), or chromium, to improve glycemia in people with diabetes (35,126). However, for special populations, including pregnant or lactating women, older adults, vegetarians, and people following very low-‍calorie or low-‍carbohydrate diets, a multivitamin may be necessary."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.10.0.0",
	"text":"3.10.0.0 Alcohol Moderate alcohol intake does not have major detrimental effects on long-‍term blood glucose control in people with diabetes. Risks associated with alcohol consumption include hypoglycemia (particularly for those using insulin or insulin secretagogue therapies), weight gain, and hyperglycemia (for those consuming excessive amounts) (35,126). People with diabetes can follow the same guidelines as those without diabetes if they choose to drink. For women, no more than one drink per day, and for men, no more than two drinks per day is recommended (one drink is equal to a 12-oz beer, a 5-oz glass of wine, or 1.5 oz of distilled spirits)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_3.11.0.0",
	"text":"3.11.0.0 Nonnutritive Sweeteners For some people with diabetes who are accustomed to sugar-‍sweetened products, nonnutritive sweeteners (containing few or no calories) may be an acceptable substitute for nutritive sweeteners (those containing calories such as sugar, honey, agave syrup) when consumed in moderation. While use of nonnutritive sweeteners does not appear to have a significant effect on glycemic control (127), they can reduce overall calorie and carbohydrate intake (51). Most systematic reviews and meta-analyses show benefits for nonnutritive sweetener use in weight loss (128,129); however, some research suggests an association with weight gain (130). Regulatory agencies set acceptable daily intake levels for each nonnutritive sweetener, defined as the amount that can be safely consumed over a person’s lifetime (35,131). For those who consume sugar-‍sweetened beverages regularly, a low-‍calorie or nonnutritive-‍sweetened beverage may serve as a short-‍term replacement strategy, but overall, people are encouraged to decrease both sweetened and nonnutritive-‍sweetened beverages and use other alternatives, with an emphasis on water intake (132)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.2.0.0",
	"text":"4.2.0.0 Recommendations Recommedations 5.24 Children and adolescents with type 1 or type 2 diabetes or prediabetes should engage in 60 min/‍day or more of moderate-‍ or vigorous-‍intensity aerobic activity, with vigorous muscle-‍strengthening and bone-‍strengthening activities at least 3 days/‍week. C 5.25 Most adults with type 1 C and type 2 B diabetes should engage in 150 min or more of moderate-‍to-vigorous intensity aerobic activity per week, spread over at least 3 days/‍week, with no more than 2 consecutive days without activity. Shorter durations (minimum 75 min/‍week) of vigorous-‍intensity or interval training may be sufficient for younger and more physically fit individuals. 5.26 Adults with type 1 C and type 2 B diabetes should engage in 2–3 sessions/‍week of resistance exercise on nonconsecutive days. 5.27 All adults, and particularly those with type 2 diabetes, should decrease the amount of time spent in daily sedentary behavior. B Prolonged sitting should be interrupted every 30 min for blood glucose benefits, particularly in adults with type 2 diabetes. C 5.28 Flexibility training and balance training are recommended 2–3 times/‍week for older adults with diabetes. Yoga and tai chi may be included based on individual preferences to increase flexibility, muscular strength, and balance. C 4.0.0.0 Physical Activity 4.1.0.0 Overview Physical activity is a general term that includes all movement that increases energy use and is an important part of the diabetes management plan. Exercise is a more specific form of physical activity that is structured and designed to improve physical fitness. Both physical activity and exercise are important. Exercise has been shown to improve blood glucose control, reduce cardiovascular risk factors, contribute to weight loss, and improve well-‍being (133). Physical activity is as important for those with type 1 diabetes as it is for the general population, but its specific role in the prevention of diabetes complications and the management of blood glucose is not as clear as it is for those with type 2 diabetes. A recent study suggested that the percentage of people with diabetes who achieved the recommended exercise level per week (150 min) varied by race. Objective measurement by accelerometer showed that 44.2%, 42.6%, and 65.1% of whites, African Americans, and Hispanics, respectively, met the threshold (134). It is important for diabetes care management teams to understand the difficulty that many patients have reaching recommended treatment targets and to identify individualized approaches to improve goal achievement. Moderate to high volumes of aerobic activity are associated with substantially lower cardiovascular and overall mortality risks in both type 1 and type 2 diabetes (135). A recent prospective observational study of adults with type 1 diabetes suggested that higher amounts of physical activity led to reduced cardiovascular mortality after a mean follow-‍up time of 11.4 years for patients with and without chronic kidney disease (136). Additionally, structured exercise interventions of at least 8 weeks’ duration have been shown to lower A1C by an average of 0.66% in people with type 2 diabetes, even without a significant change in BMI (137). There are also considerable data for the health benefits (e.g., increased cardiovascular fitness, greater muscle strength, improved insulin sensitivity, etc.) of regular exercise for those with type 1 diabetes (138). A recent study suggested that exercise training in type 1 diabetes may also improve several important markers such as triglyceride level, LDL, waist circumference, and body mass (139). Higher levels of exercise intensity are associated with greater improvements in A1C and in fitness (140). Other benefits include slowing the decline in mobility among overweight patients with diabetes (141). The ADA position statement “Physical Activity/Exercise and Diabetes” reviews the evidence for the benefits of exercise in people with type 1 and type 2 diabetes and offers specific recommendation (142)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.3.0.0",
	"text":"4.3.0.0 Exercise and Children All children, including children with diabetes or prediabetes, should be encouraged to engage in regular physical activity. Children should engage in at least 60 min of moderate-‍to-vigorous aerobic activity every day with muscle-‍ and bone-‍strengthening activities at least 3 days per week (143). In general, youth with type 1 diabetes benefit from being physically active, and an active lifestyle should be recommended to all (144). Youth with type 1 diabetes who engage in more physical activity may have better health-‍related quality of life (145)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.4.0.0",
	"text":"4.4.0.0 Frequency and Type of Physical Activity People with diabetes should perform aerobic and resistance exercise regularly (142). Aerobic activity bouts should ideally last at least 10 min, with the goal of ~30 min/‍day or more, most days of the week for adults with type 2 diabetes. Daily exercise, or at least not allowing more than 2 days to elapse between exercise sessions, is recommended to decrease insulin resistance, regardless of diabetes type (146,147). Over time, activities should progress in intensity, frequency, and/‍or duration to at least 150 min/‍week of moderate-‍intensity exercise. Adults able to run at 6 miles/‍h (9.7 km/h) for at least 25 min can benefit sufficiently from shorter-intensity activity (75 min/‍week) (142). Many adults, including most with type 2 diabetes, would be unable or unwilling to participate in such intense exercise and should engage in moderate exercise for the recommended duration. Adults with diabetes should engage in 2–3 sessions/week of resistance exercise on nonconsecutive days (148). Although heavier resistance training with free weights and weight machines may improve glycemic control and strength (149), resistance training of any intensity is recommended to improve strength, balance, and the ability to engage in activities of daily living throughout the life span. Providers and staff should help patients set stepwise goals toward meeting the recommended exercise targets. Recent evidence supports that all individuals, including those with diabetes, should be encouraged to reduce the amount of time spent being sedentary (e.g., working at a computer, watching TV) by breaking up bouts of sedentary activity (>30 min) by briefly standing, walking, or performing other light physical activities (150,151). Avoiding extended sedentary periods may help prevent type 2 diabetes for those at risk and may also aid in glycemic control for those with diabetes. A wide range of activities, including yoga, tai chi, and other types, can have significant impacts on A1C, flexibility, muscle strength, and balance (133,152,153). Flexibility and balance exercises may be particularly important in older adults with diabetes to maintain range of motion, strength, and balance (142)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.5.0.0",
	"text":"4.5.0.0 Physical Activity and Glycemic Control Clinical trials have provided strong evidence for the A1C-‍lowering value of resistance training in older adults with type 2 diabetes (154) and for an additive benefit of combined aerobic and resistance exercise in adults with type 2 diabetes (155). If not contraindicated, patients with type 2 diabetes should be encouraged to do at least two weekly sessions of resistance exercise (exercise with free weights or weight machines), with each session consisting of at least one set (group of consecutive repetitive exercise motions) of five or more different resistance exercises involving the large muscle groups (154). For type 1 diabetes, although exercise in general is associated with improvement in disease status, care needs to be taken in titrating exercise with respect to glycemic management. Each individual with type 1 diabetes has a variable glycemic response to exercise. This variability should be taken into consideration when recommending the type and duration of exercise for a given individual (138). Women with preexisting diabetes, particularly type 2 diabetes, and those at risk for or presenting with gestational diabetes mellitus should be advised to engage in regular moderate physical activity prior to and during their pregnancies as tolerated (142)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.6.0.0",
	"text":"4.6.0.0 Pre-‍exercise Evaluation As discussed more fully in Section 10 “Cardiovascular Disease and Risk Management,” the best protocol for assessing asymptomatic patients with diabetes for coronary artery disease remains unclear. The ADA consensus report “Screening for Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Diabetes” (156) concluded that routine testing is not recommended. However, providers should perform a careful history, assess cardiovascular risk factors, and be aware of the atypical presentation of coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes. Certainly, high-‍risk patients should be encouraged to start with short periods of low-‍intensity exercise and slowly increase the intensity and duration as tolerated. Providers should assess patients for conditions that might contraindicate certain types of exercise or predispose to injury, such as uncontrolled hypertension, untreated proliferative retinopathy, autonomic neuropathy, peripheral neuropathy, and a history of foot ulcers or Charcot foot. The patient’s age and previous physical activity level should be considered. The provider should customize the exercise regimen to the individual’s needs. Those with complications may require a more thorough evaluation prior to beginning an exercise program (138)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.7.0.0",
	"text":"4.7.0.0 Hypoglycemia In individuals taking insulin and/‍or insulin secretagogues, physical activity may cause hypoglycemia if the medication dose or carbohydrate consumption is not altered. Individuals on these therapies may need to ingest some added carbohydrate if pre-‍exercise glucose levels are <90 mg/dL (5.0 mmol/‍L), depending on whether they are able to lower insulin doses during the workout (such as with an insulin pump or reduced pre-‍exercise insulin dosage), the time of day exercise is done, and the intensity and duration of the activity (138,142). In some patients, hypoglycemia after exercise may occur and last for several hours due to increased insulin sensitivity. Hypoglycemia is less common in patients with diabetes who are not treated with insulin or insulin secretagogues, and no routine preventive measures for hypoglycemia are usually advised in these cases. Intense activities may actually raise blood glucose levels instead of lowering them, especially if pre-‍exercise glucose levels are elevated (157)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.8.1.0",
	"text":"4.8.0.0 Exercise in the Presence of Specific Long-‍term Compli. of DM 4.8.1.0 Retinopathy See Section 11 “Microvascular Complications and Foot Care” for more information on these long-‍term complications. Retinopathy If proliferative diabetic retinopathy or severe nonproliferative diabetic retinopathy is present, then vigorous-‍intensity aerobic or resistance exercise may be contraindicated because of the risk of triggering vitreous hemorrhage or retinal detachment (158). Consultation with an ophthalmologist prior to engaging in an intense exercise regimen may be appropriate."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.8.2.0",
	"text":"4.8.2 Peripheral Neuropathy Decreased pain sensation and a higher pain threshold in the extremities result in an increased risk of skin breakdown, infection, and Charcot joint destruction with some forms of exercise. Therefore, a thorough assessment should be done to ensure that neuropathy does not alter kinesthetic or proprioceptive sensation during physical activity, particularly in those with more severe neuropathy. Studies have shown that moderate-‍intensity walking may not lead to an increased risk of foot ulcers or reulceration in those with peripheral neuropathy who use proper footwear (159). In addition, 150 min/‍week of moderate exercise was reported to improve outcomes in patients with prediabetic neuropathy (160). All individuals with peripheral neuropathy should wear proper footwear and examine their feet daily to detect lesions early. Anyone with a foot injury or open sore should be restricted to non–weight-‍bearing activities."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.8.3.0",
	"text":"4.8.3.0 Autonomic Neuropathy Autonomic neuropathy can increase the risk of exercise-induced injury or adverse events through decreased cardiac responsiveness to exercise, postural hypotension, impaired thermoregulation, impaired night vision due to impaired papillary reaction, and greater susceptibility to hypoglycemia (161). Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy is also an independent risk factor for cardiovascular death and silent myocardial ischemia (162). Therefore, individuals with diabetic autonomic neuropathy should undergo cardiac investigation before beginning physical activity more intense than that to which they are accustomed."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_4.8.4.0",
	"text":"4.8.4.0 Diabetic Kidney Disease Physical activity can acutely increase urinary albumin excretion. However, there is no evidence that vigorous-‍intensity exercise increases the rate of progression of diabetic kidney disease, and there appears to be no need for specific exercise restrictions for people with diabetic kidney disease in general (158)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_5.2.0.0",
	"text":"5.2.0.0 Recommendations Recommendations 5.29 Advise all patients not to use cigarettes and other tobacco products A or e-‍cigarettes. B 5.30 Include smoking cessation counseling and other forms of treatment as a routine component of diabetes care. A 5.0.0.0 Smoking Cessation: Tobacco and e-‍Cigarettes 5.1.0.0 Overview Results from epidemiological, case-‍control, and cohort studies provide convincing evidence to support the causal link between cigarette smoking and health risks (163). Recent data show tobacco use is higher among adults with chronic conditions (164) as well as in adolescents and young adults with diabetes (165). Smokers with diabetes (and people with diabetes exposed to second-‍hand smoke) have a heightened risk of CVD, premature death, microvascular complications, and worse glycemic control when compared with nonsmokers (166,167). Smoking may have a role in the development of type 2 diabetes (168-171). The routine and thorough assessment of tobacco use is essential to prevent smoking or encourage cessation. Numerous large randomized clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy and cost-‍effectiveness of brief counseling in smoking cessation, including the use of telephone quit lines, in reducing tobacco use. Pharmacologic therapy to assist with smoking cessation in people with diabetes has been shown to be effective (172), and for the patient motivated to quit, the addition of pharmacologic therapy to counseling is more effective than either treatment alone (173). Special considerations should include assessment of level of nicotine dependence, which is associated with difficulty in quitting and relapse (174). Although some patients may gain weight in the period shortly after smoking cessation (175), recent research has demonstrated that this weight gain does not diminish the substantial CVD benefit realized from smoking cessation (176). One study in smokers with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes found that smoking cessation was associated with amelioration of metabolic parameters and reduced blood pressure and albuminuria at 1 year (177). In recent years e-‍cigarettes have gained public awareness and popularity because of perceptions that e-‍cigarette use is less harmful than regular cigarette smoking (178,179). Nonsmokers should be advised not to use e-‍cigarettes (180,181). There are no rigorous studies that have demonstrated that e-‍cigarettes are a healthier alternative to smoking or that e-‍cigarettes can facilitate smoking cessation (182). On the contrary, a recently published pragmatic trial found that use of e-‍cigarettes for smoking cessation was not more effective than “usual care,” which included access to educational information on the health benefits of smoking cessation, strategies to promote cessation, and access to a free text-‍messaging service that provided encouragement, advice, and tips to facilitate smoking cessation (183). Several organizations have called for more research on the short-‍ and long-‍term safety and health effects of e-‍cigarettes (184-186)."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_6.2.0.0",
	"text":"6.2.0.0 Recommendations Recommendations 5.31 Psychosocial care should be integrated with a collaborative, patient-‍centered approach and provided to all people with diabetes, with the goals of optimizing health outcomes and health-‍related quality of life. A 5.32 Psychosocial screening and follow-‍up may include, but are not limited to, attitudes about diabetes, expectations for medical management and outcomes, affect or mood, general and diabetes-‍related quality of life, available resources (financial, social, and emotional), and psychiatric history. E 5.33 Providers should consider assessment for symptoms of diabetes distress, depression, anxiety, disordered eating, and cognitive capacities using patient-‍appropriate standardized and validated tools at the initial visit, at periodic intervals, and when there is a change in disease, treatment, or life circumstance. Including caregivers and family members in this assessment is recommended. B 5.34 Consider screening older adults (aged ≥65 years) with diabetes for cognitive impairment and depression. B 6.0.0.0 Psychosocial Issues 6.1.0.0 Overview Please refer to the ADA position statement “Psychosocial Care for People With Diabetes” for a list of assessment tools and additional details (187). Complex environmental, social, behavioral, and emotional factors, known as psychosocial factors, influence living with diabetes, both type 1 and type 2, and achieving satisfactory medical outcomes and psychological well-‍being. Thus, individuals with diabetes and their families are challenged with complex, multifaceted issues when integrating diabetes care into daily life. Emotional well-‍being is an important part of diabetes care and self-‍management. Psychological and social problems can impair the individual’s (188-190) or family’s (191) ability to carry out diabetes care tasks and therefore potentially compromise health status. There are opportunities for the clinician to routinely assess psychosocial status in a timely and efficient manner for referral to appropriate services. A systematic review and meta-‍analysis showed that psychosocial interventions modestly but significantly improved A1C (standardized mean difference -0.29%) and mental health outcomes (192). However, there was a limited association between the effects on A1C and mental health, and no intervention characteristics predicted benefit on both outcomes."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_6.3.0.0",
	"text":"6.3.0.0 Screening Key opportunities for psychosocial screening occur at diabetes diagnosis, during regularly scheduled management visits, during hospitalizations, with new onset of complications, or when problems with glucose control, quality of life, or self-‍management are identified (1). Patients are likely to exhibit psychological vulnerability at diagnosis, when their medical status changes (e.g., end of the honeymoon period), when the need for intensified treatment is evident, and when complications are discovered. Providers can start with informal verbal inquires, for example, by asking if there have been changes in mood during the past 2 weeks or since the patient’s last visit. Providers should consider asking if there are new or different barriers to treatment and self-‍management, such as feeling overwhelmed or stressed by diabetes or other life stressors. Standardized and validated tools for psychosocial monitoring and assessment can also be used by providers (187), with positive findings leading to referral to a mental health provider specializing in diabetes for comprehensive evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment."
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_6.4.2.0",
	"text":"Recommendation 5.35 Routinely monitor people with diabetes for diabetes distress, particularly when treatment targets are not met and/‍or at the onset of diabetes complications. B 6.4.0.0 Diabetes Distress Diabetes distress (DD) is very common and is distinct from other psychological disorders (193-195). DD refers to significant negative psychological reactions related to emotional burdens and worries specific to an individual’s experience in having to manage a severe, complicated, and demanding chronic disease such as diabetes (194-196). The constant behavioral demands (medication dosing, frequency, and titration; monitoring blood glucose, food intake, eating patterns, and physical activity) of diabetes self-‍management and the potential or actuality of disease progression are directly associated with reports of DD (194). The prevalence of DD is reported to be 18–45% with an incidence of 38–48% over 18 months (196). In the second Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs (DAWN2) study, significant DD was reported by 45% of the participants, but only 24% reported that their health care teams asked them how diabetes affected their lives (193). High levels of DD significantly impact medication taking behaviors and are linked to higher A1C, lower self-‍efficacy, and poorer dietary and exercise behaviors (17,194,196). DSMES has been shown to reduce DD (17). It may be helpful to provide counseling regarding expected diabetes-‍related versus generalized psychological distress at diagnosis and when disease state or treatment changes (197). DD should be routinely monitored (198) using patient-‍appropriate validated measures (187). If DD is identified, the person should be referred for specific diabetes education to address areas of diabetes self-‍care that are most relevant to the patient and impact clinical management. People whose self-‍care remains impaired after tailored diabetes education should be referred by their care team to a behavioral health provider for evaluation and treatment. Other psychosocial issues known to affect self-‍management and health outcomes include attitudes about the illness, expectations for medical management and outcomes, available resources (financial, social, and emotional) (199), and psychiatric history. For additional information on psychiatric comorbidities (depression, anxiety, disordered eating, and serious mental illness), please refer to Section 4 “Comprehensive Medical Evaluation and Assessment of Comorbidities.”"
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_6.5.0.0",
	"text":"6.5.0.0 Referral to a Mental Health Specialist Indications for referral to a mental health specialist familiar with diabetes management may include positive screening for overall stress related to work-‍life balance, DD, diabetes management difficulties, depression, anxiety, disordered eating, and cognitive dysfunction (see Table 5.2 for a complete list). It is preferable to incorporate psychosocial assessment and treatment into routine care rather than waiting for a specific problem or deterioration in metabolic or psychological status to occur (26,193). Providers should identify behavioral and mental health providers, ideally those who are knowledgeable about diabetes treatment and the psychosocial aspects of diabetes, to whom they can refer patients. The ADA provides a list of mental health providers who have received additional education in diabetes at the ADA Mental Health Provider Directory (professional. diabetes.org/ada-mental-health-provider-directory). Ideally, psychosocial care providers should be embedded in diabetes care settings. Although the clinician may not feel qualified to treat psychological problems (200), optimizing the patient-provider relationship as a foundation may increase the likelihood of the patient accepting referral for other services. Collaborative care interventions and a team approach have demonstrated efficacy in diabetes self-‍management, outcomes of depression, and psychosocial functioning (17,201). Table 5.2—Situations that warrant referral of a person with diabetes to a mental health provider for evaluation and treatment If self-‍care remains impaired in a person with diabetes distress after tailored diabetes education If a person has a positive screen on a validated screening tool for depressive symptoms In the presence of symptoms or suspicions of disordered eating behavior, an eating disorder, or disrupted patterns of eating If intentional omission of insulin or oral medication to cause weight loss is identified If a person has a positive screen for anxiety or fear of hypoglycemia If a serious mental illness is suspected In youth and families with behavioral self-‍care difficulties, repeated hospitalizations for diabetic ketoacidosis, or significant distress If a person screens positive for cognitive impairment Declining or impaired ability to perform diabetes self-‍care behaviors Before undergoing bariatric or metabolic surgery and after surgery if assessment reveals an ongoing need for adjustment support"
},
{
	"page":"ENAS5566_7.0.0.0",
	"text":"7.0.0.0 References Powers MA, Bardsley J, Cypress M, et al. Diabetes self-‍management education and support in type 2 diabetes: a joint position statement of the American Diabetes Association, the American Association of Diabetes Educators, and the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1372–1382 Dickinson JK, Guzman SJ, Maryniuk MD, et al. The use of language in diabetes care and education. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1790–1799 Dickinson JK, Maryniuk MD. Building therapeutic relationships: choosing words that put people first. Clin Diabetes 2017;35:51–54 Beck J, Greenwood DA, Blanton L, et al.; 2017 Standards Revision Task Force. 2017 national standards for diabetes self-‍management education and support. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1409– 1419 Tang TS, Funnell MM, Brown MB, Kurlander JE. Self-‍management support in “real-‍world” settings: an empowerment-‍based intervention. Patient Educ Couns 2010;79:178–184 Marrero DG, Ard J, Delamater AM, et al. Twenty-‍first century behavioral medicine: a context for empowering clinicians and patients with diabetes: a consensus report. Diabetes Care 2013;36:463–470 Norris SL, Lau J, Smith SJ, Schmid CH, Engelgau MM. Self-‍management education for adults with type 2 diabetes: a meta-‍analysis of the effect on glycemic control. Diabetes Care 2002; 25:1159–1171 Haas L, Maryniuk M, Beck J, et al.; 2012 Standards Revision Task Force. National standards for diabetes self-‍management education and support. Diabetes Care 2014;37(Suppl. 1): S144–S153 Frosch DL, Uy V, Ochoa S, Mangione CM. Evaluation of a behavior support intervention for patients with poorly controlled diabetes. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:2011–2017 Cooke D, Bond R, Lawton J, et al.; U.K. NIHR DAFNE Study Group. Structured type 1 diabetes education delivered within routine care: impact on glycemic control and diabetes-‍specific quality of life. Diabetes Care 2013;36:270– 272 Chrvala CA, Sherr D, Lipman RD. Diabetes self-‍management education for adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review of the effect on glycemic control. Patient Educ Couns 2016;99:926–943 Steinsbekk A, Rygg LØ, Lisulo M, Rise MB, Fretheim A. Group based diabetes self-‍management education compared to routine treatment for people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. A systematic review with meta-‍analysis. BMC Health Serv Res 2012;12:213 Deakin T, McShane CE, Cade JE, Williams RD. Group based training for self-‍management strategies in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;2: CD003417 Cochran J, Conn VS. Meta-‍analysis of quality of life outcomes following diabetes self-‍management training. Diabetes Educ 2008;34: 815–823 He X, Li J, Wang B, et al. Diabetes self-‍management education reduces risk of all-‍cause mortality in type 2 diabetes patients: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. Endocrine 2017; 55:712–731 Thorpe CT, Fahey LE, Johnson H, Deshpande M, Thorpe JM, Fisher EB. Facilitating healthy coping in patients with diabetes: a systematic review. Diabetes Educ 2013;39:33–52 Fisher L, Hessler D, Glasgow RE, et al. REDEEM: a pragmatic trial to reduce diabetes distress. Diabetes Care 2013;36:2551–2558 Robbins JM, Thatcher GE, Webb DA, Valdmanis VG. Nutritionist visits, diabetes classes, and hospitalization rates and charges: the Urban Diabetes Study. Diabetes Care 2008;31: 655–660 Duncan I, Ahmed T, Li QE, et al. Assessing the value of the diabetes educator. Diabetes Educ 2011;37:638–657 Strawbridge LM, Lloyd JT, Meadow A, Riley GF, Howell BL. One-‍year outcomes of diabetes self-‍management training among Medicare beneficiaries newly diagnosed with diabetes. Med Care 2017;55:391–397 Piatt GA, Anderson RM, Brooks MM, et al. 3-year follow-‍up of clinical and behavioral improvements following a multifaceted diabetes care intervention: results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Educ 2010;36:301–309 Glazier RH, Bajcar J, Kennie NR, Willson K. A systematic review of interventions to improve diabetes care in socially disadvantaged populations. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1675–1688 Hawthorne K, Robles Y, Cannings-‍John R, Edwards AG. Culturally appropriate health education for type 2 diabetes mellitus in ethnic minority groups. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;3:CD006424 Chodosh J, Morton SC, Mojica W, et al. Metaanalysis: chronic disease self-‍management programs for older adults. Ann Intern Med 2005; 143:427–438 Sarkisian CA, Brown AF, Norris KC, Wintz RL, Mangione CM. A systematic review of diabetes self-‍care interventions for older, African American, or Latino adults. Diabetes Educ 2003;29: 467–479 Peyrot M, Rubin RR. Behavioral and psychosocial interventions in diabetes: a conceptual review. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2433–2440 Naik AD, Palmer N, Petersen NJ, et al. Comparative effectiveness of goal setting in diabetes mellitus group clinics: randomized clinical trial. Arch Intern Med 2011;171:453–459 Duke S-AS, Colagiuri S, Colagiuri R. Individual patienteducationfor people withtype 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;1: CD005268 Odgers-‍Jewell K, Ball LE, Kelly JT, Isenring EA, Reidlinger DP, Thomas R. Effectiveness of groupbased self-‍management education for individuals with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review with meta-‍analyses and meta-‍regression. Diabet Med 2017;34:1027–1039 Pereira K, Phillips B, Johnson C, Vorderstrasse A. Internet delivered diabetes self-‍management education: a review. Diabetes Technol Ther 2015;17:55–63 Sepah SC, Jiang L, Peters AL. Long-‍term outcomes of a Web-‍based diabetes prevention program: 2-year results of a single-‍arm longitudinal study. J Med Internet Res 2015;17:e92 Greenwood DA, Gee PM, Fatkin KJ, Peeples M. A systematic review of reviews evaluating technology-enabled diabetes self-‍management education and support. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2017;11:1015–1027 van Eikenhorst L, Taxis K, van Dijk L, de Gier H. Pharmacist-‍led self-‍management interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. A systematic literature review and meta-‍analysis. Front Pharmacol 2017;8:891 Tshiananga JKT, Kocher S, Weber C, Erny-‍Albrecht K, Berndt K, Neeser K. The effect of nurse-‍led diabetes self-‍management education on glycosylated hemoglobin and cardiovascular risk factors: a meta-‍analysis. Diabetes Educ 2012; 38:108–123 Evert AB, Boucher JL, Cypress M, et al. Nutrition therapy recommendations for the management of adults with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2014;37(Suppl. 1):S120–S143 Shah M, Kaselitz E, Heisler M. The role of community health workers in diabetes: update on current literature. Curr Diab Rep 2013;13:163– 171 Spencer MS, Kieffer EC, Sinco B, et al. Outcomes at 18 months from a community health worker and peer leader diabetes self-‍management program for Latino adults. Diabetes Care 2018;41:1414–1422 Heisler M, Vijan S, Makki F, Piette JD. Diabetes control with reciprocal peer support versus nurse care management: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2010;153:507–515 Long JA, Jahnle EC, Richardson DM, Loewenstein G, Volpp KG. Peer mentoring and financial incentives to improve glucose control in African American veterans: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2012;156:416–424 Fisher EB, Boothroyd RI, Elstad EA, et al. Peer support of complex health behaviors in prevention and disease management with special reference to diabetes: systematic reviews. Clin Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;3:4 Foster G, Taylor SJC, Eldridge SE, Ramsay J, Griffiths CJ. Self-‍management education programmes by lay leaders for people with chronic conditions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4: CD005108 Duncan I, Birkmeyer C, Coughlin S, Li QE, Sherr D, Boren S. Assessing the value of diabetes education. Diabetes Educ 2009;35:752–760 Johnson TM, Murray MR, Huang Y. Associations between self-‍management education and comprehensive diabetes clinical care. Diabetes Spectr 2010;23:41–46 Strawbridge LM, Lloyd JT, Meadow A, Riley GF, Howell BL. Use of Medicare’s diabetes self-‍management training benefit. Health Educ Behav 2015;42:530–538 Li R, Shrestha SS, Lipman R, Burrows NR, Kolb LE, Rutledge S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Diabetes self-‍management education and training among privately insured persons with newly diagnosed diabetesdUnited States, 2011–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2014;63:1045–1049 Horigan G, Davies M, Findlay-‍White F, Chaney D, Coates V. Reasons why patients referred to diabetes education programmes choosenot to attend: a systematic review. Diabet Med 2017;34:14–26 Center For Health Law and Policy Innovation. Reconsidering cost-‍sharing for diabetes self-‍management education: recommendations for policy reform [Internet]. Available from: http:// www.chlpi.org/health_library/reconsidering-cost-‍sharing-diabetes-self-‍management-education-recommendations-policy-reform/. Accessed 2 November 2018 Davies MJ, D’Alessio DA, Fradkin J, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes, 2018. A consensus report by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). Diabetes Care 2018;41:2669–2701 Briggs Early K, Stanley K. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: the role of medical nutrition therapy and registered dietitian nutritionists in the prevention and treatment of prediabetes and type 2 diabetes. J Acad Nutr Diet 2018;118:343–353 Franz MJ, MacLeod J, Evert A, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics nutrition practice guideline for type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults: systematic review of evidence for medical nutrition therapy effectiveness and recommendations for integration into the nutrition care process. J Acad Nutr Diet 2017;117:1659–1679 MacLeod J, Franz MJ, Handu D, et al. Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics nutrition practice guideline for type 1 and type 2 diabetes in adults: nutrition intervention evidence reviews and recommendations. J Acad Nutr Diet 2017;117: 1637–1658 Schwingshackl L, Chaimani A, Hoffmann G, Schwedhelm C, Boeing H. A network metaanalysis on the comparative efficacy of different dietary approaches on glycaemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Eur J Epidemiol 2018;33:157–170 Maryniuk MD. From pyramids to plates to patterns: perspectives on meal planning. Diabetes Spectr 2017;30:67–70 Schwingshackl L, Schwedhelm C, Hoffmann G, et al. Food groups and risk of all-‍cause mortality: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis of prospective studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2017;105:1462–1473 Esposito K, Maiorino MI, Ciotola M, et al. Effects of a Mediterranean-‍style diet on the need for antihyperglycemic drug therapy in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: a randomized trial. Ann Intern Med 2009;151:306–314 Boucher JL. Mediterranean eating pattern. Diabetes Spectr 2017;30:72–76 Cespedes EM, Hu FB, Tinker L, et al. Multiple healthful dietary patterns and type 2 diabetes in the Women’s Health Initiative. Am J Epidemiol 2016;183:622–633 Ley SH, Hamdy O, Mohan V, Hu FB. Prevention and management of type 2 diabetes: dietary components and nutritional strategies. Lancet 2014;383:1999–2007 Campbell AP. DASH eating plan: an eating pattern for diabetes management. Diabetes Spectr 2017;30:76–81 Rinaldi S, Campbell EE, Fournier J, O’Connor C, Madill J. A comprehensive review of the literature supporting recommendations from the Canadian Diabetes Association for the use of a plant-‍based diet for management of type 2 diabetes. Can J Diabetes 2016;40:471–477 Pawlak R. vegetarian diets in the prevention and management of diabetes and its complications. Diabetes Spectr 2017;30:82–88 Saslow LR, Daubenmier JJ, Moskowitz JT, et al. Twelve-‍month outcomes of a randomized trial of a moderate-‍carbohydrate versus very low-‍carbohydrate diet in overweight adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus or prediabetes. Nutr Diabetes 2017;7:304 Hallberg SJ, McKenzie AL, Williams PT, et al. Effectiveness and safety of a novel care model for the management of type 2 diabetes at 1 year: an open-‍label, non-‍randomized, controlled study. Diabetes Ther 2018;9:583–612 Sainsbury E, Kizirian NV, Partridge SR, Gill T, Colagiuri S, Gibson AA. Effect of dietary carbohydrate restriction on glycemic control in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;139: 239–252 U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA Drug Safety Communication: FDA revises labels of SGLT2 inhibitors for diabetes to include warnings about too much acid in the blood and serious urinary tract infections [Internet], 2015. Available from http://www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/ucm475463.htm. Accessed 2 November 2018 Blau JE, Tella SH, Taylor SI, Rother KI. Ketoacidosis associated with SGLT2 inhibitor treatment: analysis of FAERS data. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2017;33:e2924 Bowen ME, Cavanaugh KL, Wolff K, et al. The diabetes nutrition education study randomized controlled trial: a comparative effectiveness study of approaches to nutrition in diabetes self-‍management education. Patient Educ Couns 2016;99:1368–1376 Mudaliar U, Zabetian A, Goodman M, et al. Cardiometabolic risk factor changes observed in diabetes prevention programs in US settings: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002095 Balk EM, Earley A, Raman G, Avendano EA, Pittas AG, Remington PL. Combined diet and physical activity promotion programs to prevent type 2 diabetes among persons at increased risk: a systematic review for the Community Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med 2015; 163:437–451 Franz MJ, Boucher JL, Rutten-‍Ramos S, VanWormer JJ. Lifestyle weight-‍loss intervention outcomes in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized clinical trials. J Acad Nutr Diet 2015;115:1447–1463 Sumithran P, Prendergast LA, Delbridge E, et al. Long-‍term persistence of hormonal adaptations to weight loss. N Engl J Med 2011;365: 1597–1604 Hamdy O, Mottalib A, Morsi A, et al. Long-‍term effect of intensive lifestyle intervention on cardiovascular risk factors in patients with diabetes in real-‍world clinical practice: a 5-year longitudinal study. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2017;5:e000259 Lean ME, Leslie WS, Barnes AC, et al. Primary care-‍led weight management for remission of type 2 diabetes (DiRECT): an open-‍label, clusterrandomised trial. Lancet 2018;391:541–551 Mottalib A, Salsberg V, Mohd-‍Yusof B-N, et al. Effects of nutrition therapy on HbA1c and cardiovascular disease risk factors in overweight and obese patients with type 2 diabetes. Nutr J 2018;17:42 Estruch R, Ros E, Salas-‍Salvado´ J, et al.; PREDIMED Study Investigators. Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease with a Mediterranean diet supplemented with extra-‍virgin olive oil or nuts. N Engl J Med 2018;378:e34 Emadian A, Andrews RC, England CY, Wallace V, Thompson JL. The effect of macronutrients on glycaemic control: a systematic review of dietary randomised controlled trials in overweight and obese adults with type 2 diabetes in which there was no difference in weight loss between treatment groups. Br J Nutr 2015;114:1656–1666 Gardner CD, Trepanowski JF, Del Gobbo LC, et al. Effect of low-‍fat vs low-‍carbohydrate diet on 12-‍month weight loss in overweight adults and the association with genotype pattern or insulin secretion: the DIETFITS randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018;319:667–679 Sacks FM, Bray GA, Carey VJ, et al. Comparison of weight-‍loss diets with different compositions of fat, protein, and carbohydrates. N Engl J Med 2009;360:859–873 de Souza RJ, Bray GA, Carey VJ, et al. Effects of 4 weight-‍loss diets differing in fat, protein, and carbohydrate on fat mass, lean mass, visceral adipose tissue, and hepatic fat: results from the POUNDS LOST trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2012;95:614– 625 Johnston BC, Kanters S, Bandayrel K, et al. Comparison of weight loss among named diet programs in overweight and obese adults: a meta-‍analysis. JAMA 2014;312:923–933 Fox CS, Golden SH, Anderson C, et al.; American Heart Association Diabetes Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health, Council on Clinical Cardiology, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; American Diabetes Association. Update on prevention of cardiovascular disease in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus in light of recent evidence: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association and the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1777–1803 DAFNE Study Group. Training in flexible, intensive insulin management to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: Dose Adjustment for Normal Eating (DAFNE) randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2002;325:746 Delahanty LM, Nathan DM, Lachin JM, et al.; Diabetes Control and Complications Trial/‍ Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications. Association of diet with glycated hemoglobin during intensive treatment of type 1 diabetes in the Diabetes Control and Complications Trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2009;89:518–524 Wheeler ML, Dunbar SA, Jaacks LM, et al. Macronutrients, food groups, and eating patterns in the management of diabetes: a systematic review of the literature, 2010. Diabetes Care 2012;35:434–445 Thomas D, Elliott EJ. Low glycaemic index, or low glycaemic load, diets for diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;1:CD006296 Snorgaard O, Poulsen GM, Andersen HK, Astrup A. Systematic review and meta-‍analysis of dietary carbohydrate restriction in patients with type 2 diabetes. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care 2017;5:e000354 van Wyk HJ, Davis RE, Davies JS. A critical review of low-‍carbohydrate diets in people with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2016;33:148–157 Meng Y, Bai H, Wang S, Li Z, Wang Q, Chen L. Efficacy of low carbohydrate diet for type 2 diabetes mellitus management: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis ofrandomized controlled trials. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2017;131:124–131 Tay J, Luscombe-‍Marsh ND, Thompson CH, et al. Comparison of low- and high-‍carbohydrate diets for type 2 diabetes management: a randomized trial. Am J Clin Nutr 2015;102:780–790 U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Dietary guidelines for Americans 2015-2020, Eighth Edition [Internet], 2015. Available from https:/‍/‍health.gov/dietaryguidelines/2015/guidelines. Accessed 2 November 2018 Nansel TR, Lipsky LM, Liu A. Greater diet quality is associated with more optimal glycemic control in a longitudinal study of youth with type 1 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2016;104:81–87 Katz ML, Mehta S, Nansel T, Quinn H, Lipsky LM, Laffel LMB. Associations of nutrient intake with glycemic control in youth with type 1 diabetes: differences by insulin regimen. Diabetes Technol Ther 2014;16:512–518 Rossi MCE, Nicolucci A, Di Bartolo P, et al. Diabetes Interactive Diary: a new telemedicine system enabling flexible diet and insulin therapy while improving quality of life: an open-‍label, international, multicenter, randomized study. Diabetes Care 2010;33:109– 115 Laurenzi A, Bolla AM, Panigoni G, et al. Effects of carbohydrate counting on glucose control and quality of life over 24 weeks in adult patients with type 1 diabetes on continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion: a randomized, prospective clinical trial (GIOCAR). Diabetes Care 2011;34:823–827 Sa¨mann A, Mu¨hlhauser I, Bender R, Kloos Ch, Mu¨ller UA. Glycaemic control and severe hypoglycaemia following training in flexible, intensive insulin therapy to enable dietary freedom in people with type 1 diabetes: a prospective implementation study. Diabetologia 2005;48: 1965–1970 Bell KJ, Barclay AW, Petocz P, Colagiuri S, Brand-‍Miller JC. Efficacy of carbohydrate counting in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2014; 2:133–140 Bell KJ, Smart CE, Steil GM, Brand-‍Miller JC, King B, Wolpert HA. Impact of fat, protein, and glycemic index on postprandial glucose control in type 1 diabetes: implications for intensive diabetes management in the continuous glucose monitoring era. Diabetes Care 2015;38:1008– 1015 Bell KJ, Toschi E, Steil GM, Wolpert HA. Optimized mealtime insulin dosing for fat and proteinin type 1 diabetes: applicationofamodel-‍based approach to derive insulin doses for open-‍loop diabetes management. Diabetes Care 2016; 39:1631–1634 Paterson MA, Smart CEM, Lopez PE, et al. Influence of dietary protein on postprandial blood glucose levels in individuals with type 1 diabetes mellitus using intensive insulin therapy. Diabet Med 2016;33:592–598 Tuttle KR, Bakris GL, Bilous RW, et al. Diabetic kidney disease: a report from an ADA Consensus Conference. Diabetes Care 2014;37: 2864–2883 Pan Y, Guo LL, Jin HM. Low-‍protein diet for diabetic nephropathy: a meta-‍analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88:660–666 Robertson L, Waugh N, Robertson A. Protein restriction for diabetic renal disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;4:CD002181 Layman DK, Clifton P, Gannon MC, Krauss RM, Nuttall FQ. Protein in optimal health: heart disease and type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 87:1571S–1575S Institute of Medicine. Dietary reference intakes for energy, carbohydrate, fiber, fat, fatty acids, cholesterol, protein, and amino acids [Internet], 2005. Washington, DC, National Academies Press. Available from http:// www.nationalacademies.org/‍hmd/‍Reports/‍ 2002/Dietary-Reference-Intakes-for-Energy-Carbohydrate-Fiber-Fat-Fatty-Acids-Cholesterol-Protein-and-Amino-Acids.aspx Accessed 2 November 2018 Ros E. Dietary cis-monounsaturated fatty acids and metabolic control in type 2 diabetes. Am J Clin Nutr 2003;78(Suppl.):617S–625S Forouhi NG, Imamura F, Sharp SJ, et al. Association of plasma phospholipid n-3 and n-6 polyunsaturated fatty acids with type 2 diabetes: the EPIC-‍InterAct case-‍cohort study. PLoS Med 2016;13:e1002094 Wang DD, Li Y, Chiuve SE, et al. Association of specific dietary fats with total and causespecific mortality. JAMA Intern Med 2016;176: 1134–1145 Brehm BJ, Lattin BL, Summer SS, et al. One-‍year comparison of a high–monounsaturated fat diet with a high-‍carbohydrate diet in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2009;32:215–220 Shai I, Schwarzfuchs D, Henkin Y, et al.; Dietary Intervention Randomized Controlled Trial (DiRECT) Group. Weight loss with a lowcarbohydrate, Mediterranean, or low-‍fat diet. N Engl J Med 2008;359:229–241 Brunerova L, Smejkalova V, Potockova J, Andel M. A comparison of the influence of a high-‍fat diet enriched in monounsaturated fatty acids and conventional diet on weight loss and metabolic parameters in obese non-‍diabetic and type 2 diabetic patients. Diabet Med 2007;24: 533–540 Bloomfield HE, Koeller E, Greer N, MacDonald R, Kane R, Wilt TJ. Effects on health outcomes of a Mediterranean diet with no restriction on fat intake: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. Ann Intern Med 2016;165:491– 500 Sacks FM, Lichtenstein AH, Wu JHY, et al.; American Heart Association. Dietary fats and cardiovascular disease: a presidential advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2017;136:e1–e23 Jacobson TA, Maki KC, Orringer CE, et al.; NLA Expert Panel. National Lipid Association recommendations for patient-‍centered management of dyslipidemia: part 2. J Clin Lipidol 2015;9 (Suppl.):S1–S122.e1 Harris WS, Mozaffarian D, Rimm E, et al. Omega-‍6 fatty acids and risk for cardiovascular disease: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Nutrition Subcommittee of the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; Council on Cardiovascular Nursing; and Council on Epidemiology and Prevention. Circulation 2009;119:902–907 Crochemore ICC, Souza AFP, de Souza ACF, Rosado EL. v-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid supplementation does not influence body composition, insulin resistance, and lipemia in women with type 2 diabetes and obesity. Nutr Clin Pract 2012;27:553–560 Holman RR, Paul S, Farmer A, Tucker L, Stratton IM, Neil HA; Atorvastatin in Factorial with Omega-‍3 EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes Study Group. Atorvastatin in Factorial with Omega-‍3 EE90 Risk Reduction in Diabetes (AFORRD): a randomised controlled trial. Diabetologia 2009;52:50–59 Kromhout D, Geleijnse JM, de Goede J, et al. n-3 fatty acids, ventricular arrhythmia-related events, and fatal myocardial infarction in post-‍myocardial infarction patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:2515–2520 Bosch J, Gerstein HC, Dagenais GR, et al.; ORIGIN Trial Investigators. n-3 fatty acids and cardiovascular outcomes in patients with dysglycemia. N Engl J Med 2012;367:309–318 Thomas MC, Moran J, Forsblom C, et al.; FinnDiane Study Group. The association between dietary sodium intake, ESRD, and all-‍cause mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:861–866 Ekinci EI, Clarke S, Thomas MC, et al. Dietary salt intake and mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2011;34:703–709 Lennon SL, DellaValle DM, Rodder SG, et al. 2015 Evidence Analysis Library evidence-‍based nutrition practice guideline for the management of hypertension in adults. J Acad Nutr Diet 2017; 117:1445–1458.e17 Maillot M, Drewnowski A. A conflict between nutritionally adequate diets and meeting the 2010 dietary guidelines for sodium. Am J Prev Med 2012;42:174–179 Aroda VR, Edelstein SL, Goldberg RB, et al.; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Long-‍term metformin use and vitamin B12 deficiency in the Diabetes Prevention Program Outcomes Study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2016;101:1754–1761 Allen RW, Schwartzman E, Baker WL, Coleman CI, Phung OJ. Cinnamon use in type 2 diabetes: an updated systematic review and meta-‍analysis. Ann Fam Med 2013;11:452–459 Mitri J, Pittas AG. Vitamin D and diabetes. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am 2014;43: 205–232 Mozaffarian D. Dietary and policy priorities for cardiovascular disease, diabetes, and obesity: a comprehensive review. Circulation 2016;133: 187–225 Grotz VL, Pi-‍Sunyer X, Porte D Jr, Roberts A, Richard Trout J. A 12-week randomized clinical trial investigating the potential for sucralose to affect glucose homeostasis. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2017;88:22–33 Miller PE, Perez V. Low-‍calorie sweeteners and body weight and composition: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. Am J Clin Nutr 2014;100:765–777 Rogers PJ, Hogenkamp PS, de Graaf C, et al. Does low-‍energy sweetener consumption affect energy intake and body weight? A systematic review, including meta-‍analyses, of the evidence from human and animal studies. Int J Obes 2016; 40:381–394 Azad MB, Abou-‍Setta AM, Chauhan BF, et al. Nonnutritive sweeteners and cardiometabolic health: a systematic review and metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials and prospective cohort studies. CMAJ 2017;189: E929–E939 Eckel RH, Jakicic JM, Ard JD, et al. 2013 AHA/ ACC guideline on lifestyle management to reduce cardiovascular risk: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2013;129(Suppl.):S76–S99 Johnson RK, Lichtenstein AH, Anderson CAM, et al.; American Heart Association Nutrition Committee of the Council on Lifestyle and Cardiometabolic Health; Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing; Council on Clinical Cardiology; Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research; Stroke Council. Low-‍calorie sweetened beverages and cardiometabolic health: a science advisory from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2018;138:e126–e140 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee. 2018 Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Scientific Report. Washington, DC, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018 Bazargan-‍Hejazi S, Arroyo JS, Hsia S, Brojeni NR, Pan D. A racial comparison of differences between self-‍reported and objectively measured physical activity among US adults with diabetes. Ethn Dis 2017;27:403–410 Sluik D, Buijsse B, Muckelbauer R, et al. Physical activity and mortality in individuals with diabetes mellitus: a prospective study and meta-‍analysis. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1285– 1295 Tikkanen-‍Dolenc H, Wade´n J, Forsblom C, et al.; FinnDiane Study Group. Physical activity reduces risk of premature mortality in patients with type 1 diabetes with and without kidney disease. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1727–1732 Boule´ NG, Haddad E, Kenny GP, Wells GA, Sigal RJ. Effects of exercise on glycemic control and body mass in type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-‍analysis of controlled clinical trials. JAMA 2001;286:1218–1227 Colberg SR, Riddell MC. Physical activity: regulation of glucose metabolism, clinical management strategies, and weight control. In American Diabetes Association/JDRF Type 1 Diabetes Sourcebook. Peters A, Laffel L, Eds. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 2013 Ostman C, Jewiss D, King N, Smart NA. Clinical outcomes to exercise training in type 1 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2018;139:380–391 Boule´ NG, Kenny GP, Haddad E, Wells GA, Sigal RJ. Meta-‍analysis of the effect of structured exercise training on cardiorespiratory fitness in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetologia 2003;46:1071–1081 Rejeski WJ, Ip EH, Bertoni AG, et al.; Look AHEAD Research Group. Lifestyle change and mobility in obese adults with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2012;366:1209–1217 Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Yardley JE, et al. Physical activity/exercise and diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2065–2079 Janssen I, Leblanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-‍aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2010;7:40 Riddell MC, Gallen IW, Smart CE, et al. Exercise management in type 1 diabetes: a consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2017;5:377–390 Anderson BJ, Laffel LM, Domenger C, et al. Factors associated with diabetes-‍specific health-‍related quality of life in youth with type 1 diabetes: the global TEENs study. Diabetes Care 2017;40:1002–1009 Jelleyman C, Yates T, O’Donovan G, et al. The effects of high-‍intensity interval training on glucose regulation and insulin resistance: a metaanalysis. Obes Rev 2015;16:942–961 Little JP, Gillen JB, Percival ME, et al. Low-‍volume high-‍intensity interval training reduces hyperglycemia and increases muscle mitochondrial capacity in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Appl Physiol (1985) 2011;111:1554–1560 U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2008 physical activity guidelines for Americans [Internet], 2008. Available from https:/‍/‍health.gov/paguidelines/guidelines/default.aspx. Accessed 2 November 2018 Willey KA, Singh MAF. Battling insulin resistance in elderly obese people with type 2 diabetes: bring on the heavy weights. Diabetes Care 2003;26:1580–1588 Katzmarzyk PT, Church TS, Craig CL, Bouchard C. Sitting time and mortality from all causes, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2009;41:998–1005 Dempsey PC, Larsen RN, Sethi P, et al. Benefits for type 2 diabetes of interrupting prolonged sitting with brief bouts of light walking or simple resistance activities. Diabetes Care 2016;39:964–972 Cui J, Yan J-H, Yan L-M, Pan L, Le J-J, Guo Y-Z. Effects of yoga in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a meta-‍analysis. J Diabetes Investig 2017;8:201–209 Lee MS, Jun JH, Lim H-J, Lim H-S. A systematic review and meta-‍analysis of tai chi for treating type 2 diabetes. Maturitas 2015;80:14–23 Colberg SR, Sigal RJ, Fernhall B, et al.; American College of Sports Medicine; American Diabetes Association. Exercise and type 2 diabetes. The American College of Sports Medicine and the American Diabetes Association: joint position statement executive summary. Diabetes Care 2010;33:2692–2696 Church TS, Blair SN, Cocreham S, et al. Effects of aerobic and resistance training on hemoglobin A1c levels in patients with type 2 diabetes: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2010;304:2253–2262 Bax JJ, Young LH, Frye RL, Bonow RO, Steinberg HO, Barrett EJ; ADA. Screening for coronary artery disease in patients with diabetes. Diabetes Care 2007;30:2729–2736 Peters A, Laffel L (Eds.). American Diabetes Association/JDRF Type 1 Diabetes Sourcebook. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 2013 Colberg SR. Exercise and Diabetes: A Clinician&#39;s Guide to Prescribing Physical Activity. Alexandria, VA, American Diabetes Association, 2013 Lemaster JW, Reiber GE, Smith DG, Heagerty PJ, Wallace C. Daily weight-‍bearing activity does not increase the risk of diabetic foot ulcers. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003;35:1093–1099 Smith AG, Russell J, Feldman EL, et al. Lifestyle intervention for pre-‍diabetic neuropathy. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1294–1299 Spallone V, Ziegler D, Freeman R, et al.; Toronto Consensus Panel on Diabetic Neuropathy. Cardiovascular autonomic neuropathy in diabetes: clinical impact, assessment, diagnosis, and management. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 2011;27:639–653 Pop-‍Busui R, Evans GW, Gerstein HC, et al.; Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Study Group. Effects of cardiac autonomic dysfunction on mortality risk in the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) trial. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1578–1584 Suarez L, Barrett-‍Connor E. Interaction between cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus in the prediction of death attributed to cardiovascular disease. Am J Epidemiol 1984;120:670– 675 Stanton CA, Keith DR, Gaalema DE, et al. Trends in tobacco use among US adults with chronic health conditions: National Survey on Drug Use and Health 2005–2013. Prev Med 2016; 92:160–168 Bae J. Differences in cigarette use behaviors by age at the time of diagnosis with diabetes from young adulthood to adulthood: results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. J Prev Med Public Health 2013;46: 249–260 Sliwin´ska-‍Mosson´ M, Milnerowicz H. The impact of smoking on the development of diabetes and its complications. Diab Vasc Dis Res 2017;14:265–276 Kar D, Gillies C, Zaccardi F, et al. Relationship of cardiometabolic parameters in non-‍smokers, current smokers, and quitters in diabetes: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. Cardiovasc Diabetol 2016;15:158 Jankowich M, Choudhary G, Taveira TH, Wu W-C. Age-, race-, and gender-‍specific prevalence of diabetes among smokers. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2011;93:e101–e105 Akter S, Goto A, Mizoue T. Smoking and the risk of type 2 diabetes in Japan: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. J Epidemiol 2017;27: 553–561 Liu X, Bragg F, Yang L, et al.; China Kadoorie Biobank Collaborative Group. Smoking and smoking cessation in relation to risk of diabetes in Chinese men and women: a 9-year prospective study of 0.5 million people. Lancet Public Health 2018;3:e167–e176 Yeh HC, Duncan BB, Schmidt MI, Wang NY, Brancati FL. Smoking, smoking cessation, and risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2010;152:10–17 Tonstad S, Lawrence D. Varenicline in smokers with diabetes: a pooled analysis of 15 randomized, placebo-controlled studies of varenicline. J Diabetes Investig 2017;8:93– 100 West R. Tobacco smoking: health impact, prevalence, correlates and interventions. Psychol Health 2017;32:1018–1036 Ranney L, Melvin C, Lux L, McClain E, Lohr KN. Systematic review: smoking cessation intervention strategies for adults and adults in special populations. Ann Intern Med 2006;145: 845–856 Tian J, Venn A, Otahal P, Gall S. The association between quitting smoking and weight gain: a systematic review and metaanalysis of prospective cohort studies. Obes Rev 2015;16:883–901 Clair C, Rigotti NA, Porneala B, et al. Association of smoking cessation and weight change with cardiovascular disease among adults with and without diabetes. JAMA 2013;309:1014– 1021 Voulgari C, Katsilambros N, Tentolouris N. Smoking cessation predicts amelioration of microalbuminuria in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes mellitus: a 1-year prospective study. Metabolism 2011;60:1456–1464 Huerta TR, Walker DM, Mullen D, Johnson TJ, Ford EW. Trends in e-‍cigarette awareness and perceived harmfulness in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 2017;52:339–346 Pericot-‍Valverde I, Gaalema DE, Priest JS, Higgins ST. E-‍cigarette awareness, perceived harmfulness, and ever use among U.S. adults. Prev Med 2017;104:92–99 Leventhal AM, Strong DR, Kirkpatrick MG, et al. Association of electronic cigarette use with initiation of combustible tobacco product smoking in early adolescence. JAMA 2015;314:700– 707 Leventhal AM, Stone MD, Andrabi N, et al. Association of e-‍cigarette vaping and progression to heavier patterns of cigarette smoking. JAMA 2016;316:1918–1920 Hartmann-‍Boyce J, McRobbie H, Bullen C, Begh R, Stead LF, Hajek P. Electronic cigarettes for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;9:CD010216 Halpern SD, Harhay MO, Saulsgiver K, Brophy C, Troxel AB, Volpp KG. A pragmatic trial of e-‍cigarettes, incentives, and drugs for smoking cessation. N Engl J Med 2018;378:2302–2310 Schraufnagel DE, Blasi F, Drummond MB, et al.; Forum of International Respiratory Societies. Electronic cigarettes. A position statement of the Forum of International Respiratory Societies. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;190:611– 618 Bam TS, Bellew W, Berezhnova I, et al.; Tobacco Control Department International Union Against Tuberculosis and Lung Disease. Position statement on electronic cigarettes or electronic nicotine delivery systems. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis 2014;18:5–7 Bhatnagar A, Whitsel LP, Ribisl KM, et al.; American Heart Association Advocacy Coordinating Committee, Council on Cardiovascular and Stroke Nursing, Council on Clinical Cardiology, and Council on Quality of Care and Outcomes Research. Electronic cigarettes: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2014;130:1418–1436 Young-‍Hyman D, de Groot M, Hill-‍Briggs F, Gonzalez JS, Hood K, Peyrot M. Psychosocial care for people with diabetes: a position statement of the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care 2016;39:2126–2140 Anderson RJ, Grigsby AB, Freedland KE, et al. Anxiety and poor glycemic control: a meta-‍analytic review of the literature. Int J Psychiatry Med 2002;32:235–247 Delahanty LM, Grant RW, Wittenberg E, et al. Association of diabetes-‍related emotional distress with diabetes treatment in primary care patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabet Med 2007; 24:48–54 Anderson RJ, Freedland KE, Clouse RE, Lustman PJ. The prevalence of comorbid depression in adults with diabetes: a meta-‍analysis. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1069–1078 Kovacs Burns K, Nicolucci A, Holt RIG, et al.; DAWN2 Study Group. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): crossnational benchmarking indicators for family members living with people with diabetes. Diabet Med 2013;30:778–788 Harkness E, Macdonald W, Valderas J, Coventry P, Gask L, Bower P. Identifying psychosocial interventions that improve both physical and mental health in patients with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. Diabetes Care 2010;33:926–930 Nicolucci A, Kovacs Burns K, Holt RIG, et al.; DAWN2 Study Group. Diabetes Attitudes, Wishes and Needs second study (DAWN2™): cross-‍national benchmarking of diabetes-‍related psychosocial outcomes for people with diabetes. Diabet Med 2013;30:767–777 Fisher L, Hessler DM, Polonsky WH, Mullan J. When is diabetes distress clinically meaningful?: establishing cut points for the Diabetes Distress Scale. Diabetes Care 2012;35:259–264 Fisher L, Glasgow RE, Strycker LA. The relationship between diabetes distress and clinical depression with glycemic control among patients with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2010;33:1034–1036 Aikens JE. Prospective associations between emotional distress and poor outcomes in type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2012;35:2472– 2478 Fisher L, Skaff MM, Mullan JT, et al. Clinical depression versus distress among patients with type 2 diabetes: not just a question of semantics. Diabetes Care 2007;30:542–548 Snoek FJ, Bremmer MA, Hermanns N. Constructs of depression and distress in diabetes: time for an appraisal. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2015;3:450–460 Gary TL, Safford MM, Gerzoff RB, et al. Perception of neighborhood problems, health behaviors, and diabetes outcomes among adults with diabetes in managed care: the Translating Research Into Action for Diabetes (TRIAD) study. Diabetes Care 2008;31:273– 278 Beverly EA, Hultgren BA, Brooks KM, Ritholz MD, Abrahamson MJ, Weinger K. Understanding physicians’ challenges when treating type 2 diabetic patients’ social and emotional difficulties: a qualitative study. Diabetes Care 2011;34:1086–1088 Huang Y, Wei X, Wu T, Chen R, Guo A. Collaborative care for patients with depression and diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and meta-‍analysis. BMC Psychiatry 2013;13: 260"
}
]