3.3.0.0 Mod­er­ate Ver­sus Tight Glycemic Con­trol

A meta-‍anal­y­sis of over 26 stud­ies, in­clud­ing the Nor­mo­glycemia in In­ten­sive Care Eval­u­a­tion–Sur­vival Using Glu­cose Al­go­rithm Reg­u­la­tion (NICE-‍SUGAR) study, showed in­creased rates of “se­vere hy­po­glycemia” (defined in the anal­y­sis as blood glu­cose <40 mg/dL [2.2 mmol/‍L]) and mor­tal­i­ty in co­horts with tight ver­sus mod­er­ate glycemic con­trol (22). Re­cent ran­dom­ized con­trolled stud­ies and me­ta­ana­ly­ses in sur­gi­cal pa­tients have also re­port­ed that tar­geting pe­ri­op­er­a­tive blood glu­cose lev­els to <180 mg/dL (10 mmol/‍L) is as­so­ci­at­ed with lower rates of mor­tal­i­ty and stroke com­pared with a tar­get glu­cose <200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/‍L), where­as no significant ad­di­tional benefit was found with more strict glycemic con­trol (<140 mg/dL [7.8 mmol/‍L]) (23,24). In­sulin ther­a­py should be ini­ti­at­ed for treat­ment of per­sis­tent hy­per­glycemia start­ing at a thresh­old ≥180 mg/dL (10.0 mmol/‍L). Once in­sulin ther­a­py is start­ed, a tar­get glu­cose range of 140–180 mg/dL (7.8–10.0 mmol/‍L) is rec­om­mend­ed for the ma­jor­i­ty of crit­i­cal­ly ill and noncrit­i­cal­ly ill pa­tients (2). More strin­gent goals, such as <140 mg/dL (7.8 mmol/‍L), may be ap­pro­pri­ate for se­lect­ed pa­tients, as long as this can be achieved with­out significant hy­po­glycemia. Con­verse­ly, high­er glu­cose ranges may be ac­cept­able in ter­mi­nal­ly ill pa­tients, in pa­tients with se­vere co­mor­bidi­ties, and in in­pa­tient care set­tings where fre­quent glu­cose mon­i­tor­ing or close nurs­ing su­per­vi­sion is not fea­si­ble.

Clin­i­cal judg­ment com­bined with on­go­ing as­sess­ment of the pa­tient’s clin­i­cal sta­tus, in­clud­ing changes in the tra­jec­to­ry of glu­cose mea­sures, ill­ness sever­i­ty, nu­tri­tion­al sta­tus, or con­comi­tant med­i­ca­tions that might af­fect glu­cose lev­els (e.g., glu­co­cor­ti­coids), should be in­cor­po­rat­ed into the day-‍to-‍day de­ci­sions re­gard­ing in­sulin dos­ing (2).