2.2.0.0 Screen­ing

The pre­ventive ef­fects of ther­a­py and the fact that pa­tients with pro­lif­er­a­tive di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy (PDR) or mac­u­lar edema may be asymp­tomat­ic pro­vide strong sup­port for screen­ing to de­tect di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy.

An oph­thal­mol­o­gist or op­tometrist who is knowl­edge­able and ex­pe­ri­enced in di­ag­nos­ing di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy should per­form the ex­am­i­na­tions. Youth with type 1 or type 2 di­a­betes are also at risk for com­pli­ca­tions and need to be screened for di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy (87). If di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy is pre­sent, prompt re­fer­ral to an oph­thal­mol­o­gist is rec­om­mend­ed. Sub­se­quent ex­am­i­na­tions for pa­tients with type 1 or type 2 di­a­betes are gen­er­ally re­peat­ed an­nu­al­ly for pa­tients with min­i­mal to no retinopa­thy. Exams every 1–2 years may be cost-ef­fective after one or more nor­mal eye exams, and in a pop­u­la­tion with well-‍con­trolled type 2 di­a­betes, there was es­sen­tial­ly no risk of de­vel­op­ment of significant retinopa­thy with a 3-year in­ter­val after a nor­mal ex­am­i­na­tion (88). Less fre­quent in­ter­vals have been found in sim­u­lat­ed mod­el­ing to be po­ten­tially ef­fective in screen­ing for di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy in pa­tients with­out di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy (89). More fre­quent ex­am­i­na­tions by the oph­thal­mol­o­gist will be re­quired if retinopa­thy is pro­gress­ing.

Reti­nal pho­tog­ra­phy with re­mote read­ing by ex­perts has great po­ten­tial to pro­vide screen­ing ser­vices in areas where qualified eye care pro­fes­sion­als are not read­i­ly avail­able (82,83). High-‍qual­i­ty fun­dus pho­tographs can de­tect most clin­i­cally significant di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy. In­ter­pre­ta­tion of the im­ages should be per­formed by a trained eye care pro­vider. Reti­nal pho­tog­ra­phy may also en­hance efficien­cy and re­duce costs when the ex­pertise of oph­thal­mol­o­gists can be used for more com­plex ex­am­i­na­tions and for ther­a­py (90,91). In-‍per­son exams are still nec­es­sary when the reti­nal pho­tos are of unac­cept­able qual­i­ty and for fol­low-‍up if abnor­malities are de­tected. Reti­nal pho­tos are not a sub­sti­tute for com­pre­hen­sive eye exams, which should be per­formed at least ini­tially and at in­ter­vals there­after as rec­om­mend­ed by an eye care pro­fes­sion­al. Re­sults of eye ex­am­i­na­tions should be doc­u­ment­ed and trans­mit­ted to the re­fer­ring health care pro­fes­sion­al.

Type 1 Di­a­betes

Be­cause retinopa­thy is es­ti­mat­ed to take at least 5 years to de­vel­op after the onset of hy­per­glycemia, pa­tients with type 1 di­a­betes should have an ini­tial di­lat­ed and com­pre­hen­sive eye ex­am­i­na­tion with­in 5 years after the di­ag­no­sis of di­a­betes (92).

Type 2 Di­a­betes

Pa­tients with type 2 di­a­betes who may have had years of undi­ag­nosed di­a­betes and have a significant risk of preva­lent di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy at the time of di­ag­no­sis should have an ini­tial di­lat­ed and com­pre­hen­sive eye ex­am­i­na­tion at the time of di­ag­no­sis.

Preg­nan­cy

Preg­nan­cy is as­so­ci­at­ed with a rapid pro­gres­sion of di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy (93,94). Women with pre­ex­ist­ing type 1 or type 2 di­a­betes who are plan­ning preg­nan­cy or who have be­come preg­nant should be coun­seled on the risk of de­vel­op­ment and/‍or pro­gres­sion of di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy. In ad­di­tion, rapid im­ple­men­ta­tion of in­ten­sive glycemic man­age­ment in the set­ting of retinopa­thy is as­so­ci­at­ed with early wors­en­ing of retinopa­thy (86). Women who de­vel­op gestational di­a­betes mel­li­tus do not re­quire eye ex­am­i­na­tions dur­ing preg­nan­cy and do not ap­pear to be at in­creased risk of de­vel­oping di­a­bet­ic retinopa­thy dur­ing preg­nan­cy (95).